UK and US ‘should follow Australia with sexual violence survey’

Researchers argue that national data provides a powerful call to action

August 4, 2017
A protest sign reading "I was wearing pants + a sweater, was it my fault too?" Taken during "Slut Walk 2012" in Toronto.
Source: iStock

Australia’s nationwide survey of sexual assault and harassment in universities provides a model for other leading higher education systems to follow, researchers say.

The Australian Human Rights Commission’s survey of 30,000 students in all of the country’s universities was the first national study of its kind in the world and sparked renewed commitments from institutions and policymakers to tackle the problem.

Among a long list of concerning findings, the study found that one in 10 female students at Australian universities said that they had been sexually assaulted within the past two years, and that half of all students (51 per cent) said that they had been sexually harassed during 2016.

However, the vast majority of victims said that they had not made a formal report or complaint to their higher education institution. Only 6 per cent of students felt that their university was doing enough to provide clear and accessible information on sexual harassment procedures, policies and support services, and this figure fell to 4 per cent in relation to sexual assault.

With the US and UK also grappling with rising concern about sexual violence on campus, researchers have suggested that the Australian approach might provide a powerful call to action elsewhere, too.

Sexual violence researcher Michelle Munro-Kramer, an assistant professor in the University of Michigan’s School of Nursing, said her personal opinion was that a similar national survey in the US would be “helpful”.

“As a researcher I believe that data is necessary to inform interventions, change policy, and ultimately influence the flow of money towards necessary public health interventions,” Professor Munro-Kramer said. “National-level data on sexual violence among our young people, including those in college and those in the community, has the potential to be a driving force to tackle this public health problem.”

Professor Munro-Kramer said that there would be a number of barriers to such an exercise, including different definitions of sexual violence by state and university. But she argued that it was “important to find solutions to these barriers so that the US can consider national level approaches”.

Carolyn Jackson, a professor in Lancaster University’s department of educational research, said that surveys conducted in the UK had been “on a much smaller scale” than the Australian one.

“National surveys are generally more likely to be taken seriously by institutions,” she said.

However, Professor Jackson cautioned that critiques of the Australian survey would need to be taken into account, and that national survey data “needs to be read and used alongside the rich data provided by qualitative methods”.

The Australian survey found that, overall, 6.9 per cent of students had been sexually assaulted in the past two years, with 1.9 per cent saying that the attack occurred in a university setting (including travel to or from campus).

Women were almost twice as likely as men to report sexual harassment.

About half of the victims of sexual harassment or assault in a university setting said that they knew some or all of the perpetrators, with the perpetrators being male in the majority of cases (71 per cent for sexual harassment, and 83 per cent for sexual assault).

chris.havergal@timeshighereducation.com

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

相关文章

Reader's comments (1)

The need is for action, not simply a call for action as suggested here. Markedly increased reporting is key.

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October