Pandemic ‘frees’ researchers from ‘hampering’ habit of travel

Nottingham vice-chancellor insists international collaboration can become ‘even better’ using digital communication

九月 1, 2020
Shearer West, University of Nottingham v-c

The loss of academic conferences during the coronavirus pandemic has revealed how research collaboration has been “hampered” by an over-reliance on in-person meetings, a university head has told the Times Higher Education World Academic Summit.

Shearer West, vice-chancellor of the University of Nottingham, said academia’s embrace of virtual communication during the Covid-19 crisis had shown that it was “possible to work even better than we did before when we were hampered by our habits of face-to-face conferences and meetings”.

“When our labs started reopening, people said they spent more time talking to their international collaborators than when they could fly across the sky to meet them,” said Professor West, who added that the use of digital communication during lockdown had particularly benefited research collaboration between her university’s three campuses in Nottingham, Malaysia and China.

Professor West told the virtual THE event that sector leaders should “not take our eye off the ball to this possibility” of improving international research collaboration using digital tools.

Academia’s response to the coronavirus had been a “stellar example of interdisciplinary and international research” showing how a “scientific problem can be understood and solved by scientists in different parts of the world sharing their knowledge”, she said.

Other university leaders also praised how researchers had swiftly adopted virtual conferencing and communications, but noted that this form of digital interaction was much harder to arrange.

Luc Sels, rector of KU Leuven, in Belgium, said it was “paradoxical” that the “model of virtual mobility needs deeper collaboration, more coordination and organisation than simple student [and staff] mobility”, which typically saw PhD candidates and junior researchers spend several months in the laboratories of different universities.

However, some senior scientists at the THE event questioned Professor West’s implication that virtual conferencing can replicate some of the more important elements of more traditional in-person academic gatherings.

Yoav Yair, a professor in the Open University of Israel’s department of natural sciences, wondered whether “for research collaborations…we can dispense with physical meeting and travel?”

“Until now, many strong collaborations between scientists have been derived from individuals spending significant periods in each other’s labs,” he said.

Tim Softley, pro vice-chancellor (research and knowledge transfer) at the University of Birmingham, asked: “Would those collaborations [that ran successfully in lockdown] have been initiated without face-to-face meetings?”

Christine Ennew, provost at the University of Warwick, said universities would “need both the face to face and the virtual” to continue to cooperate internationally.

“The initial face to face is important in building the initial relationship but once that relationship is in place, it is much easier to sustain and develop through digital channels,” Professor Ennew said.



  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.


Reader's comments (2)

A thought-provoking piece, thank you. It is interesting that the leaders of education and research have become so reticent if nor resistant to championing virtual collaborations until now. Not all universities or research centres have had the resources to send their researchers or academics to global meetings or conferences and these have seldom had alternative engagement opportunities. This period is perhaps one that begins to level the playing field where more can participate on more equal footing. The challenge is not to simply replace previous channels of engagement but to see this as an opportunity to broaden it. It is also an opportunity to reconcile that the impact of travel as a contributor to global warming - perhaps the larger elephant in the room. For a sector that appears to otherwise committed to pointing out that we must begin to take steps to re-align itself to forestall global catastrophe; we appeared to see ourselves as justified in increasing not decreasing travel for conferences and meetings (and a tacked-on holiday!). The reality is that just one long-haul round-trip (or annual total of 34k km) would exceed a full annual emission quota (3.5 tonnes) for every individual on this planet by 2030 as set out by the IPCC. How do we reconcile this without appearing elitist, insincere or indeed duplicitous to the communities we serve? The global impact of COVID-19 allows everyone to step back and re-think the track we were on and whether it was either truly optimal or indeed, responsible. In this way, we may also retain - or indeed, regain - the trust in our communities that we accept that our actions have unwittingly contributed to inequalities in engagement in education and research as well as our impact on climate change. This is an opportunity to see how we can do it better.
As one who has never travelled to conferences, but heard the sordid tales of genetic information sharing at them often enough, it's probably a good thing that such things are on the wain.