Iceland’s paucity of male graduates sparks reform plan

Men account for just 28 per cent of graduates from Iceland’s main university

August 29, 2018
Source: istock

Iceland is to restructure its education system amid growing concerns about a shortage of male graduates.

Just 28 per cent of graduates from the University of Iceland – the country’s largest – were male in 2017, down from 41 per cent in 2001. This decline has prompted politicians to take action.

In an interview with the radio station Rás 1, Lilja Alfreðsdóttir, Iceland’s minister of education, science and culture, revealed that work was under way to create a long-term plan for education until 2030, the Iceland Review reported.

Ms Alfreðsdóttir explained that the Icelandic authorities were seeking inspiration from Norway, which has just introduced a substantial package of educational reforms.

“I am meeting with the Norwegian minister of education next week to familiarise myself thoroughly with their improvements,” she said, adding that she had recently attended a meeting at the University of Iceland “where it was revealed that 70 per cent of graduates [this year] are women”.

Last year, the university’s president, Jón Atli Benediktsson, told the Visir news website that graduation rates for men had declined gradually since the turn of the millennium.

“It’s a worrying state of affairs that men are enrolling in lower numbers to the university,” said Professor Benediktsson. “It’s a trend that needs to be turned, but it will take time.”

Female students vastly outnumber male students in nearly all departments at the University of Iceland, except for engineering and the natural sciences, he added.

“It matters that the society is balanced in terms of gender in the labour market [and] that there isn’t a gender gap in the labour market in certain fields,” Professor Benediktsson said.

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。




  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论



Log in or register to post comments


Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October