UCU’s Sally Hunt censured over handling of pensions strike

No-confidence motion that triggered walkouts at the University and College Union’s June congress is shelved at recall event

October 18, 2018
Sally Hunt, UCU general secretary
Source: Alamy

University and College Union general secretary Sally Hunt has been censured by members over her handling of UK higher education’s pensions strike, but a controversial no-confidence motion was withdrawn.

The no-confidence motion from the University of Exeter’s UCU branch, which called for “the resignation of Sally Hunt as general secretary with immediate effect”, caused uproar at the union’s congress in Manchester in June when union officials repeatedly blocked efforts to debate it.

The three-day event was eventually abandoned after a third walkout by Ms Hunt and senior UCU staff members, who claimed that the motion constituted an unacceptable breach of rules protecting employees’ dignity at work and an unconstitutional attempt to remove a democratically elected official.

At a recall congress held in Manchester on 18 October, the no-confidence motion was tabled to be debated alongside other issues that had been sidelined by the disruptions to the June event.

However, the motion, which drew attention to Ms Hunt’s handling of a Universities UK offer in late March that ultimately ended the Universities Superannuation Scheme strike, was withdrawn on the day by Mike Finn, one of the two delegates for the Exeter branch.

Delegates agreed not to discuss the motion, which claimed that Ms Hunt’s actions were representative of a “democratic deficit in the union affecting members across sectors, manifested through a continuous pattern of unilateral, undemocratic action by the national leadership”.

Ms Hunt did not attend the conference. Earlier this month, she announced that she was taking a break from the UCU after doctors warned her that the “very high” pressure of the past year risked worsening her multiple sclerosis.

The Exeter branch has not disclosed why it withdrew the motion.

However, a motion of censure in Ms Hunt, which was tabled by the branch of King’s College London, was passed in her absence.

That motion criticised Ms Hunt’s claim that “the majority of branch representatives wanted an immediate ballot of members” on the UUK offer to establish a joint expert panel to review pension valuation in exchange for ending the strike, stating that she did not have “any verifiable evidence to support this claim”.

“A member-led union requires clarity, transparency and accountability of its decision-making processes,” stated the motion, which resolved that “future branch representatives’ positions are recorded in a clear and verifiable manner”.

Emma-Jane Phillips, a UCU delegate for Northumbria University who attended the recall event, said that she “welcomed the withdrawal of the [no-confidence] motion” and called the decision “sensible”.

jack.grove@timeshighereducation.com

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

相关文章

From the largest strike in the history of UK higher education, to the US ‘academic precariat’ looking to unionise to improve their conditions, Jack Grove assesses the changing influence of workers’ organisations

11 October

Reader's comments (1)

Shoddy reporting n the ongoing saga of Sally Hunt's dismal record as the general secretary of UCU - again. The censure motion was not 'controversial, I was there, Grove cannot have been or else he would know this. One selective quote from a delegate which is unrepresentative of the debate... The THE should do better.

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

赞助