Generation snowflake? What’s that? say students

University of Leeds study finds many undergraduates have never heard of term, or ‘trigger warnings’

January 30, 2018
Thin ice sign
Source: Getty
Snow go: interviewees said that the term ‘snowflake generation’ was ‘an unfair, sweeping label for an eclectic group of people’

If you read the UK’s right-wing press, you’d imagine that “snowflake” students talk of little other than “trigger warnings”.

But according to a new study, many undergraduates have not even heard of either term.

Lydia Bleasdale and Sarah Humphreys, from the University of Leeds’ Leeds Institute for Teaching, interviewed 55 undergraduates as part of a project exploring students’ resilience and how it affects learning. A total of 185 students also completed a survey.

As part of the study, students were asked what they thought of the terms “snowflake generation” – characterising young adults who are allegedly quick to take offence and too emotionally vulnerable to cope with views that challenge their own – and “trigger warnings”, statements that give students notice that teaching materials contain potentially distressing matter.

“Probably the most interesting thing was that so many of them hadn’t even heard of the phrase ‘snowflake generation’ and hadn’t heard of ‘trigger warnings’,” Ms Bleasdale told Times Higher Education. “What they would typically say was that they were aware of or familiar with it but not necessarily in the educational context.”

When the terms were explained to them, students typically held “modest views of both phrases and their implications”, according to the report.

Ms Humphreys explained that students talked about trigger warnings “in terms of preparing themselves rather than choosing not to engage with something”.

In particular, the report says, students were keen to point out that trigger warnings were necessary in certain subjects at university, such as biological sciences, law and medicine.

Moreover, students “displayed awareness” that the diverse university population meant that some might be more appreciative of trigger warnings than others, and that topics such as cancer, divorce or bereavement might be particularly difficult for some learners.

But others were less sympathetic, with one commenting that they were “in favour of freedom of speech and that people have to get outside of their bubbles and realise the world is harsh”.

When asked their opinion of the term “snowflake generation”, interviewees “were likely to say they could see some truth in it, but that it was an unfair, sweeping label for an eclectic group of people”, the report says.

Some respondents referenced aspects of modern life that they felt were more difficult for young people today, such as employment pressures, property prices and constant social media connectivity.

However, some interviewees were critical of their students’ union for banning certain things, with one commenting: “It’s the actions of…a few people that have managed to label a whole generation as snowflakes.”

sophie.inge@timeshighereducation.com

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

相关文章

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October