Racial divide is higher education’s ‘dirty secret’

Race is higher education’s “dirty little secret” and more should be done to tackle the issue, a debate has heard.

十二月 16, 2012

Mark Crawley, dean of students at the University of the Arts London (UAL), told the Race in the Creative Process event that the sector needed more discussion about the discrepancy in attainment between black and minority ethnic students.

“Higher education has a dirty little secret: white students get more firsts and 2:1s than black students – and no one even talks about it,” he said.

Detailed analysis of the figures made it clear that this applied even when differences in social class had been taken into account, he added.

“We don’t know why this is,” admitted Mr Crawley, “but we should certainly talk and disagree about it.”

The debate, which took place at the Chelsea College of Art and Design on 12 December, was organised by UAL’s Shades of Noir project, which aims to raise awareness of race issues in the art, design and communication industries.

Panellists were asked about how they dealt with their own unconscious biases, which parts of the “creative education process” should be “devoid of any race connections” and whether they saw a place for “positive discrimination”.

Fairooz Aniqa, students’ union cultural and diversity officer at UAL, put the case for trying out blind marking, to see if that had an impact on results.

She also argued that there was a role for positive discrimination in arts education as “the only way to break the nepotistic nature of the creative industries”.

Sculptor and artist Hew Locke noted that “teaching should be about encouraging people rather than making allowances for their backgrounds”.

However, he said he recognised, and often knew personally, all the black British artists listed on Wikipedia. He looked forward to the day when there were so many that a large proportion would be unfamiliar to him.




  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.

Reader's comments (1)

'Students’ union cultural and diversity officer at UAL...argued that there was a role for positive discrimination in arts education as “the only way to break the nepotistic nature of the creative industries”.' Did I read that right? Positive discimination is unlawful in most cases in the UK. The Cultural and Diversity Officer should know this, and it is extremely disturbing for it to be officially advocating that kind of practice. UAL's policy is to eliminate all forms of discrimination, so why is it that ArtsSU are going against this and demanding more?