Scottish Labour hints at ‘no fees’ policy

Shadow education secretary tells conference of party’s ‘direction of travel’ ahead of 2016 elections

十月 10, 2014

Scottish Labour’s “direction of travel” is to rule out the introduction of tuition fees north of the border, according to the party’s shadow education secretary.

Kezia Dugdale said she was “very hopeful” she would be able to pledge to keep undergraduate study free but cautioned that this would only happen if sufficient funding was also available to widen access and to reduce the student drop-out rate in the country.

The MSP struck a different tone to that previously adopted by Scottish Labour leader Johann Lamont, who said in 2012 that it was “not viable” to fund a mass participation higher education sector using only public funds and claimed that such a system was “essentially regressive” because it helped a disproportionate number of graduates from privileged backgrounds.

If “no fees” policy is included in Scottish Labour’s manifesto for the 2016 election to the country’s parliament, it would appear to secure free university tuition in Scotland for the foreseeable future, given that the party’s main rival, the ruling SNP, has made free higher education a cornerstone of its administration.

The Scottish government also announced yesterday it would offer a £4,500 loan to postgraduate students on certain courses to assist them with their living costs from 2015.

Speaking at a conference in Edinburgh yesterday, Ms Dugdale claimed Scotland had the worst record among the home nations for student support and widening access and also expressed concern about the drop-out rate.

If Scottish Labour is unable to commit to tackling these issues, the party “cannot commit to the top line policy about free tuition”, Ms Dugdale said, but she added that she was “very hopeful” this pledge could be made. She said a party review of the issue was “coming to a close”.

Pressed on whether this meant Scottish Labour was poised to rule out introducing tuition fees, Ms Dugdale added: “That is the direction of travel we are committed to going in.”

While Scottish-domiciled students attend university in the country for free, they are charged up to £9,000 a year to study elsewhere in the UK. Students from England, Wales and Northern Ireland are charged up to £9,000 to study in Scotland but European Union students also study for free in Scotland because of EU rules.

There had been warnings that, had Scotland had voted for independence in September, the country’s universities might have been forced to offer free tuition to students from across the UK – with potentially significant financial implications.

Speaking at the same “Reimagining the University” conference organised by trade unions, Scottish education secretary Michael Russell warned that, if tuition fees were introduced, the people who would suffer the most would be the poorest students.

Alice Brown, chairman of the Scottish Funding Council, said that higher education nevertheless remained a “closed fiefdom” for part of society, either due to economic poverty or poverty of aspiration.



  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.

Reader's comments (2)

This is a rather pointless article on a non-story spun by a politician who spent most of the referendum campaign lying blatantly and from a party that has no hope in hell of returning to power in Scotland after their coalition with the Conservatives in the No campaign and in local authorities.
Sorry, that was a slightly intemperate initial reaction. My point though is that Labour campaigned for the last 2 years on a 'One Nation' unionist basis. If they now believe in no fees for Scotland, why is it not also their policy across the rest of the 'nation'? This was the party that introduced fees in the first place (despite not being in their manifesto). What would be more interesting to see would be this 'direction of travel' being the same at Westminster as in the Scotland and the rest of Europe. Otherwise one might suspect it is simply about trying to stop their rapid decline in the Holyrood polls rather than a belief in education as a public good.