Remains in a museum

April 17, 1998

NEIL Chalmers is inaccurate in claiming that the World Archaeological Congress had access to the Natural History Museum's archives on its human remains collection in 1991-92 (Letters, THES, March ). WAC did request permission for Cressida Fforde and an assistant to be given access (May 13, 1992) but this request was refused (July 7, 1992).

The World Archaeological Bulletin 6 (1992) simply contains a list of items identified by Dr Fforde from sources outside the museum as being in the collections. The accuracy of this list was checked by museum staff. At no time has WAC considered the published list to be complete. Only access to the archives would confirm this.

WAC is committed to bringing information about museum collections into the public domain and therefore renews its request for a bona fide researcher, such as Dr Fforde and an assistant, to be allowed access to relevant archives at the Natural History Museum.

Julian Thomas, Secretary. World Archaeological Congress

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October