Chinese students in UK ‘manipulated’ by embassy, MPs told

Committee hears claim that director of research centre lost job in row over funding from foreign state

September 3, 2019
Confucius statue
Source: iStock

Chinese students in the UK are being “manipulated and used” by the country’s embassy, MPs have been told.

At the meeting of the Foreign Affairs Committee, MPs questioned whether Chinese Confucius Institutes undermined academic freedom in UK universities, while a London School of Economics professor told them of a research centre director who lost their job in a row over funding from a foreign state.

The hearing, focusing on “influence in UK universities by autocratic states”, came after the US Senate criticised the hosting of Confucius Institutes by US universities, and while the Australian government considers whether Confucius Institutes at the nation’s universities should be registered as sources of foreign influence. An agency of the Chinese government provides funding and teachers for Confucius Institutes, which promote Chinese language and culture.

Speaking generally about universities’ links with autocratic states, Christopher Hughes, a professor of international relations at the LSE who appeared as a witness, told the committee that there was “bullying and pressure”. He added: “I’ve seen someone lose their position as head of a research centre over clashes over funding from a certain state.” He said he would not add further details.

Professor Hughes also highlighted the controversy over a sculpture at LSE which depicted a map showing China and Taiwan in different colours.

He continued: “There is evidence that some parts of the student body are being manipulated and used by the [Chinese] embassy and their agents, and that this is organised.”

He also said: “If you try to raise these issues, you end up being marginalised of course, and you become ‘a troublemaker’.”

Professor Hughes said on Confucius Institutes: “We have found the paper trail which takes this back to the office in Beijing which is part of the Communist Party of China.”

The LSE hosts a Confucius Institute for Business.

Bill Rammell, the University of Bedfordshire vice-chancellor who also appeared as a witness, said that, providing the “right checks and balances” were put in place by universities, “I don’t think international partnerships with autocracies are a threat to academic freedom”.

Mr Rammell, the chair of the MillionPlus association of modern universities, said one member of the group has a Confucius Institute and his understanding was that it teaches only Mandarin language and Chinese medicine. “Quite how that is promoting the merits of the Chinese Communist Party is a bit beyond me,” he added.

Tom Tugendhat, Conservative chair of the committee, at one stage read out a list of universities across the world that have opted to close their Confucius Institutes.

Bob Seely, another Tory member of the committee, highlighted the US and Australian government concern over Confucius Institutes, suggesting that “having that direct involvement of a one-party state” could “limit intellectual freedom”.

Mr Rammell highlighted the benefits to the UK from attracting international students and cautioned against “restrictions” being implemented without sufficient evidence, “that might come back to haunt us”.

john.morgan@timeshighereducation.com

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

Reader's comments (3)

Meanwhile, American-owned media in Australia, from Channel 7 to Netflix and Fox News, manipulate Australians with impunity.
A nameless professor cites an unsubstantiated bullying incident and a statue shows China and Taiwan in different colours. wow! For "goverment-backed Confucius" Institute read "British Council" and see what you think..................
"Bill Rammell, the University of Bedfordshire vice-chancellor who also appeared as a witness, said that, providing the “right checks and balances” were put in place by universities, “I don’t think international partnerships with autocracies are a threat to academic freedom”." There are none so blind as those that will not see. Having witnessed a Chinese 'Party' coordinator in action in a UK University I have little doubt the Chinese state seeks to influence and control, they also appear to use staff and students to commit industrial espionage in research departments. If your really 'lucky' and doing something of interest to the Chinese state the Ambassador will visit and some of his party will get lost so they can snoop, having evicted two 'lost' secretarial 'assistants' discussing an experimental set-up in detail from a Lab who didn't know I understood Mandarin during one such visit I'm in no doubt thats a regular practice. The apparent Chinese obsession with selfies is also good way to 'innocently' photograph things in labs, with a built in human to scale from later.

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October