Words, not numbers 1

十二月 22, 2006

In claiming that citation counting is unlikely to deliver, Ole Petersen (Opinion, December 15) overlooks a point missed by many.

Yes, citation counting can be an unreliable way to judge an individual, for a variety of reasons, some of which he rehearses. But as a measure of an aggregation of people of different ages and research styles, such as the members of a university department, it works well because its failings tend to affect all aggregations similarly. This is not just an opinion; there is good empirical evidence for it.

The mean citation counts of whole departments correlate extremely highly with research assessment exercise ratings.

Andy Smith
Royal Holloway, University of London



  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.