Still logged on at the cutting edge 2

February 16, 2007

Although I agree with the underlying message of Neil McBride's article, is it not obvious that "computer science" is undergoing change? Is this unusual, given the dynamic and fast-evolving nature of this relatively new discipline? It may be undergoing (yet) another paradigm shift in its evolution and application, but that does not mean that we should jettison those principles on which this change is based. Would we seriously consider much older disciplines such as physics dead because of the latest advances in that discipline? In the same way that Newton's laws of motion still hold in their application domain, so do the principles of computer science.

With regard to the recent decline in student enrolments, unfortunately potential recruits believe that computer science's fortunes have been tangled in the hype surrounding the worldwide web and the bursting of the "dotcom" bubble.

At the same time, the computer scientist's skills are very much in demand.

Their supply increasingly seems likely to be met by "importing" staff from India and China if the UK and the US turn their backs on computer science.

Robert Manderson.
Watford

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

赞助

推荐职位