People skills needed

July 28, 2006

The report "Struggle to fill v-c job vacancies" (July 21) raises two issues. The first is that the emphasis of the new recruitment focus appears to be whether vice-chancellors can cope with financial and market pressures. There is not much explicit mention of leadership skills in managing people or creating an environment to take forward teaching and research, yet our experience is that without these it is hard to retain the confidence of the university's most valuable resource - its staff, who are increasingly buffeted by the market and financial pressures.

No one is suggesting that the ability to manage increasingly complex institutional finances in a context of markets and uncertainty is not an element of the skill set a vice-chancellor requires, but surely it would be tragic if the emphasis on market forces deters those best able to command the respect of their staff.

The second issue is whether the sector is now paying the price for vice-chancellors and others appointing people similar to themselves to senior management positions across the sector. The proportion of female vice-chancellors and other very senior managers is still far too small, while ethnic minorities and those with disabilities remain almost invisible at the most senior levels, with a few honourable exceptions.

There is a challenge, but it is one that permeates the sector at many levels - appointing the best people with the right skills through fair and transparent processes and being clear that those skills should not primarily be financial ones except where that is a necessary job requirement.

Roger Kline
Head of equality and employment rights, UCU

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October