Cultural creationism

七月 2, 2009

Angela McRobbie recommends Judith Butler's new book, Frames of War, for its "clear thread of continuity" with her early work in Gender Trouble and Bodies That Matter, but that is a damning indictment (Book of the Week, 25 June).

Readers from disciplines where arrant nonsense is not routinely paraded as truth (that is, outside English and cultural studies) will be amazed by Butler's claim that biological sex is a "fictional coherence" inflicted upon bodies by language.

Indeed, the exclamation "It's a girl!" is supposed to generate a new fact, just as "I hereby sentence you ..." undoubtedly does. Trouble is, sex is widespread beyond the human species where dimorphism has somehow flourished without the aid of coercive utterances.

Butler's implicit denial of the evolution of sexual characteristics is a form of cultural creationism that embarrasses the disciplines that endorse it. "Performativity theory" is almost as flimsy as homoeopathy, but more widespread in academia and far more respectable. If Butler's new book shows the same scant respect for evidence and argument as her first two, then thanks but no thanks.

Greg Garrard, Bath Spa University.

Please login or register to read this article.

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments