Art of science management

五月 22, 2008

The greatest damage to the community's trust in the Science and Technology Facilities Council has been self-inflicted. Its embattled chief executive's public denial of the scale of the cuts and his evidence to the Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills Select Committee led MPs to call for "substantial and urgent changes" to "restore confidence".

"Lamentable communications" highlighted by the MPs' report and the lack of specialist advisory panels could be attributed to the youth of the STFC. But the hasty withdrawal from long-term international projects without proper consultation was inexcusable, since a flat-cash settlement had necessarily formed the basis for STFC's forward-planning assumptions. As Keith Mason knows only too well, "it is a mistake to think that excellent scientists will automatically make good managers" ("Blue skies and sterling support", 24 April).

Of course, Mason would not have been put under such intense scrutiny had the Treasury's settlement been more generous. Partial responsibility for the physics funding crisis rests with Government, regardless of any disputed legacy issues. Physicists now await the Government's response to the MPs' recommendations after such unwelcome and unnecessary distractions.

Paul Crowther, University of Sheffield.

Please login or register to read this article.

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments