Leader: Paper points to action on fees and funding

七月 12, 2002

An autumn white paper is a sensible way to address the interlinked problems of student support and higher education funding. Why ministers ever thought they could be resolved separately is a mystery.

But that does not mean that universities or their students will like the eventual outcome: there will be a temptation to arrive at a classic British fudge to the displeasure of both. Education secretary Estelle Morris rightly concludes that she has been left to pick up the pieces of long-term underinvestment. With top-up fees ruled out in this Parliament, her proposals will be among the first battlegrounds for the next election. Universities have a strong case for public investment, but hospitals are a greater political imperative. Students are the obvious alternative source of revenue, but they and their predominantly middle-class families are voters whose support will be needed.

By airing the issues now, the government is taking the political temperature in good time. As Ms Morris says, the fact that we are having the debate represents some progress, although she is reluctant to admit that the logical conclusion of her analysis is that top-up fees are on the way. As in 1997, the politician's instinct will surely be to set the precedent but limit electoral damage by starting charges off relatively low.

Please Login or Register to read this article.

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
Register