Thoughtless theorising

二月 13, 1998

IS Catherine Belsey sending herself up? Her article (THES, January 30) on literary theory contains the following: "Young lecturers take it for granted" and "It must gall senior academics to be upstaged by colleagues half their age, who reproduce the vocabulary of theory without thinking about it and then grab attention at conferences".

Without thinking, they take theory for granted. What has happened to the old academic imperative to think critically? How are these young zealots so different from all those "white, patrician and patriarchal" figures Belsey mocks who, presumably, took patriarchy for granted without thinking about it.

I note too that for all her heavy reliance on a romantic, untheorised, young/old, junior/senior binary opposition, Belsey is a professor. Presumably she hires and fires, puts students in degree boxes and generally carries out those radically subversive activities professors are famous for.

There are of course plenty of people out there who think critically about theory including Gary Day, Edward Said, Sara Mills, Valentine Cunningham, Terry Eagleton, Mark Turner and Joseph Carroll, but you would not guess it from Belsey's incredibly smug self-congratulation.

Malcolm Povey. Carbery Avenue. Southbourne. Bournemouth

Please login or register to read this article.

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments