Sad result of flexibility

May 1, 1998

THE deletion of 78 posts at the University of East London (THES, April 3) sees Labour's "flexible" employment policy enacted. It sadly reflects the sometimes iniquitous double-talk prevalent among politicians.

During the recent recession higher education was an alternative to unemployment and funding was made available. Now recruitment has dropped and so the Higher Education Funding Council moves swiftly to reduce our aggregate student numbers by 200 and thus the grant received.

Therefore the university management deletes 78 livelihoods; what else can it do? For some of the individuals concerned, this is without the cushion of the Teachers Superannuation Scheme or lump sums for many years of service; save for three months' severance pay. Part of a government's task used to be to protect those who are vulnerable to such ruthless disposability. Instead, government is an active participant in their demise, at both ends of the age spectrum.

Andrew Chanerley

University of East London

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October