Hundreds protest at killing of student

November 30, 2001

Hundreds of Zimbabwean students fought running battles with the police this week after the death of one of their colleagues at the hands of soldiers.

Their attempts to march into the capital Harare to join a civil-rights protest were physically thwarted by the authorities.

Students were incensed by the death of Lameck Chemvura, a 22-year-old student who was allegedly strangled with a shoelace and thrown from a moving train by soldiers. He was accused of supporting the opposition Movement for Democratic Change.

Police told the state-controlled newspaper, The Herald , that Mr Chemvura's death occurred during a brawl and was not politically motivated. Spokesman Wayne Bvudzijena said a soldier had been arrested and charged. But witnesses reported seeing six soldiers throw the young man from a train, and students do not believe the official explanation.

On Tuesday, 11 students from the University of Zimbabwe and 28 civil-rights activists were arrested for trying to demonstrate against proposed amendments to electoral laws, a police spokesman said.

A university lecturer, who did not want to be named, claimed riot police fired tear gas at protesting students, who "retaliated with stones". Police sealed off approaches to parliament and to the University of Zimbabwe to prevent the protest.

Student leader Tapera Kapuya was among those arrested. The students were charged with malicious injury to property, police said, and end-of-year examinations were postponed.

This week's events are the latest in a saga that has unfolded over the past year. Students have been rallying against government clampdowns on the judiciary and the press, against attacks on students and opposition parties ahead of presidential elections early next year, and against inadequate state allowances.

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。




  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论


Log in or register to post comments


Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October