Call for UK to underwrite Horizon Europe bids as deadline nears

Director of Universities UK International says some institutions have modelled falls in EU student enrolment of up to 80 per cent

June 19, 2019

The UK government should extend its underwriting of European Union research grants to the bloc’s next framework programme as the country may not join it in a “timely manner” after Brexit, while some universities have modelled “catastrophic” falls in EU recruitment that would lead to course closures, according to a senior sector figure.

Vivienne Stern, director of Universities UK International, was among witnesses who gave evidence to MPs on the House of Commons Exiting the European Union Committee on 19 June.

Asked to explain the view of her organisation on a no-deal Brexit, Ms Stern said: “It is a creeping horror that something we thought might happen by accident might actually now be the deliberate policy of government.”

UK universities are desperately hoping that the government will agree a deal with the EU for the UK to associate to the union’s next research programme, Horizon Europe, which starts in 2021, after the scheduled completion of Brexit.

Beth Thompson, head of UK and EU policy at the Wellcome Trust, said that a “fracture” with the EU in a no-deal exit would be “difficult to come back from” in the association talks.

She warned: “I don’t think we should underestimate the difficulty of doing that [reaching an association deal] in a no-deal situation...Politically, I think it would be hugely difficult to associate in a no-deal [scenario].”

Ms Stern called for the government to extend the underwrite it offered on the current EU research programme, Horizon 2020 – where the government said it would cover funding if the UK left the EU without a deal – to the successor programme.

The EU is yet to finalise the regulations for Horizon Europe and UK-EU talks on association are yet to begin. The impending choice of a new European Commission could delay the start of the talks until 2020, some fear.

“We may not be in a position to negotiate association to Horizon Europe, the next programme, in a timely manner,” said Ms Stern. “That’s starting in 2021: we should be having those conversations now. This political circumstance…means it’s unlikely we are going to do that.

“So the government’s going to have to think about, in my view, extending the guarantees they have already offered, to say to European partners: ‘If you want a UK university in your consortium…for Horizon Europe bids, we’ll put the money on the table, it’s there.’ Nobody has said that so far.”

Asked about the future of EU student recruitment after Brexit, Ms Stern said her personal belief was that UK universities would not see a “total collapse” in such recruitment.

But she added that there “will be an impact”. “I can tell you some universities have modelled what I would regard as catastrophic decreases in EU enrolment: up to 80 per cent,” Ms Stern said. “When you work that through to the bottom line, that means closing courses.”

john.morgan@timeshighereducation.com

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

相关文章

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October