Scholarship is still valued

June 26, 2008

Martin Cohen's witty attack on academic bookshops ("Banality at bargain prices", 12 June) singled out my Last Witnesses: The Muggletonian History as a recent casualty. Coincidentally, The London Review of Books carried a positive appraisal of it by the doyen of academic reviewers, Patrick Collinson.

When I submitted the manuscript to a famous university press, one reader thought that it could be published as it stood. The second reader was more complimentary still, on readability as well as scholarship, but he or she doubted whether it would sell. This was excellent advice, particularly if Cohen's researches are correct. On the whole, books that are not stocked rarely command huge sales. How lucky I was to find a non-university press that put scholarship above profits.

William Lamont, Emeritus professor, University of Sussex.

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。




  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论


Log in or register to post comments


Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October