As simple as ABC ..

十一月 12, 2009

Michael Worton finds a lack of a "clear and compelling identity for modern foreign languages" ("Speak up to keep languages alive, review says", 22 October). He also notes a recent change of identity, with the traditional focus on ancient and modern literature being replaced by modern cultural studies.

Oddly, he doesn't mention the most obvious focus of all for a language department: language. Some innovative departments take language seriously, but in most departments language skills are taught by non-research staff, and there is hardly any place for teaching about the language - about its history, its varieties, its structure, or even its link to culture.

At the same time, he argues that language departments are important because the country needs expertise in languages, but without asking how the study of literature or culture may promote expertise and interest in language. The joined-up thinking that he calls for surely suggests a rather simple answer to the problems of both the language departments and the nation.

If language departments really were departments of language, their identity would be clearer and the nation would see how important they were in language education.

Richard Hudson, FBA, Emeritus professor of linguistics, University College London.

Please login or register to read this article.

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments