Private provision is a bankrupt approach 2

四月 30, 2009

In 1981, for the first time in its history, the University Grants Committee decided that financial cuts should not create "equal misery", but be differentially directed. The major cuts - much greater than any of the proposed ones that are supposedly putting the future of certain universities at risk today - fell on the former Colleges of Advanced Technology (CATs), which lost up to 40 per cent of their income. Yet each found a collegial solution to its problems, so that 28 years later they all prosper. There is a lesson here for today's financial "failures", none of which is in as dire a situation as the ex-CATs were in 1981, but whose problems are being tackled via top-down managerialism.

Lewis Elton Honorary professor of higher education, University College London.

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.