Cable ‘taken aback’ by recent v-c pay rises

Business secretary urges restraint and calls for the sector to halt ‘salary escalation at the top level’. Simon Baker reports

May 27, 2010

Vince Cable has accused the university sector of lacking “realism and self-sacrifice” and urged “restraint” in pay for vice-chancellors and other senior staff.

The business secretary, who has overall responsibility for higher education, said he was “taken aback” when he found out that vice-chancellors’ pay rose by more than 10 per cent in 2008-09. He said it bore “no relation” to the economic problems facing the country.

In a letter jointly signed by David Willetts, the universities and science minister, he also asks the leaders of every college and university to do “more with less”.

Mr Cable told the Daily Telegraph: “I was very taken aback to discover that last year the pay of vice-chancellors rose by over 10 per cent in the middle of a financial crisis.

“There is some gap between reality and expectations in some of those institutions and although it is not our job to control pay – it is an independent mechanism – we want to signal to them that there has got to be some restraint.”

Referring to a recent visit to a struggling car plant where managers were taking a pay cut, the Liberal Democrat minister added: “I just get absolutely no sense in the university sector that there is the same degree of realism and of self-sacrifice that is going to have to happen if we are going to preserve the quality of university education.

“There is clearly salary escalation at the top level that bears no relation to the underlying economics of the country.”

Figures published in Times Higher Education in April show that pay and benefits for the leaders of 152 higher education institutions rose by 10.6 per cent in 2008-09, taking the average vice-chancellor’s salary package to £219,156.

However, the Universities and Colleges Employers Association said at the time that settlements for 2009-10 were much lower, with 70 per cent of heads receiving either no increase at all or only a 0.5 per cent rise.

Steve Smith, president of Universities UK, said Mr Cable was referring to decisions made almost two years ago and that institutions were now showing restraint.

“Obviously vice-chancellors are paid a large amount, but the vast majority will not see pay increases this year or next year, and that seems appropriate in the current economic climate,” he said.

Meanwhile, the annual accounts from the Higher Education Funding Council for England, which have just been published, show that chief executive Sir Alan Langlands earned £230,000 last year.

simon.baker@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Lecturer in Business and Management DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY
Director of the Roslin Institute THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH
Lecturer in Economics DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY
International Director UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (8 September 2016)

Some lecturers will rightly encourage forms of student interaction that are impossible for those covering their faces, Eric Heinze argues

Handwritten essay on table

Universities must pay more attention to the difficulties faced by students, says Daniel Dennehy

University of Oxford students walking on campus

University of Oxford snatches top spot from Caltech in this year’s World University Rankings as Asia’s rise continues

Theresa May entering 10 Downing Street, London

The prospect of new grammar schools on the horizon raises big questions for HE, writes Nick Hillman

Nosey man outside window

Head of UK admissions service Mary Curnock Cook addresses concerns that universities might ‘not hear a word’ from applicants