Figure it out 1

May 30, 2003

It is deeply worrying that an education secretary should be wondering out loud about the purpose, role and value of UK universities ("Devil's advocate ignites row", THES , May 16). Charles Clarke's department should have briefed him better. It has the statistics.

Indeed, his own office has told potential students that they must pay more for degrees because their employment value and earnings potential with a degree far outstrip the fees to be levied.

We may now begin to understand the lack of thinking that so obviously misinformed the white paper.

Clarke's mock-debate buffoonery is simply more of the old prevarication thrown up in the forlorn hope that some other solution will offer itself or that the problem of radical underfunding will disappear.

If Clarke wants to engage in academic debate, then let him enrol and pay fees (or get his parents to pay), like any other seeker after truth and understanding.

Andrew J. Morgan

Already registered?

Sign in now if you are already registered or a current subscriber. Or subscribe for unrestricted access to our digital editions and iPad and iPhone app.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Register to continue  

You've enjoyed reading five THE articles this month. Register now to get five more, or subscribe for unrestricted access.

Most Commented

  • Boats docked in Port Hercule, Monaco

Richard Murphy praises a bold effort to halt tax-dodging by the 1 per cent

It’s a question with no easy answer, finds James Derounian

  • Man walking, University of Oxford campus, photo negative

Donald Brown shares the experiences that prompted him to talk about ‘institutional racism’ at Oxford

  • Egg timer and clock showing deadlines

Meghan Duffy thinks you can get on in academia without being chained to your desk

  • James Fryer illustration (19 November 2015)

With no time for proper peer review and with grade inflation inevitable, one academic felt compelled to resign