Examining the evidence

July 10, 2008

If Peter Williams doubts that the external examiner system is no longer fit for purpose (Letters, 3 July), let me now extend an invitation to him to meet me and review the first-hand evidence (not hearsay) that has been passed to me following my inaugural lecture at the University of Buckingham last month.

Meanwhile, since in his view (which I share) there is no national external examiner system in the UK, is he able to explain why this non-existent system is still being wheeled out by Universities UK whenever the assurance of national academic standards is questioned? If a UK university announced that it was moving to a US market-based system - the system that has produced Harvard, Yale and Princeton, for instance - and doing away with external examiners, would his Quality Assurance Agency object, and, if so, why?

Geoffrey Alderman, University of Buckingham.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments