Examining the evidence

July 10, 2008

If Peter Williams doubts that the external examiner system is no longer fit for purpose (Letters, 3 July), let me now extend an invitation to him to meet me and review the first-hand evidence (not hearsay) that has been passed to me following my inaugural lecture at the University of Buckingham last month.

Meanwhile, since in his view (which I share) there is no national external examiner system in the UK, is he able to explain why this non-existent system is still being wheeled out by Universities UK whenever the assurance of national academic standards is questioned? If a UK university announced that it was moving to a US market-based system - the system that has produced Harvard, Yale and Princeton, for instance - and doing away with external examiners, would his Quality Assurance Agency object, and, if so, why?

Geoffrey Alderman, University of Buckingham.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments